- The Naked Anthropologist - http://www.lauraagustin.com -

Second-wave feminism: Revolution, not Rescue

Posted By laura agustin On 4 September 2012 @ 09:56 In trafficking | 25 Comments

[1]In some country far away, in a box I left in someone’s attic or garage decades ago, there is a copy of this newsletter, which I bought in June 1968. I can see myself holding it, in a tiny apartment on Bank Street in New York’s Greenwich Village, when it was not the hyper-chic area it is now. The single-burner hotplate sits on a shelf, the bathroom sink is cluttered with dirty dishes, and it is all for me alone.

In Notes from the First Year Shulamith Firestone asked:

What does the word ‘feminism’ bring to mind? A granite faced spinster obsessed with a vote? Or a George Sand in cigar and bloomers, a woman against nature? Chances are that whatever image you have, it is a negative one. To be called a feminist has become an insult, so much so that a young woman intellectual, often radical in every other area, will deny vehemently that she is a feminist, will be ashamed to identify in any way with the early women’s movement, calling it cop-out or reformist or demeaning it politically without knowing even the little that is circulated about it. . . Notes from the First Year. The New York Radical Women, 1968.

[2]Are you surprised anyone would say that in 1968? I discovered Firestone and I were the same age when she died the other day. We also looked superficially alike: granny glasses assured that, though my own hair would never lie down Rapunzel-like (no extant photos of me, though). I met her once briefly but never attended the meetings where her particular feminist theory was made.

Nowadays people talk as though all women interested in liberation in the 1960s were thinking the same thing, but it wasn’t like that. It was a movement of women, with all sorts of ideas being bandied around simultaneously. There weren’t any leaders. The material in Notes from the First Year was exciting, but I did not think that I was outside the cool centre because I did not sit in rooms with serious theorists calling themselves radical. My ideas were ill-formed, and I couldn’t have written a book about them, but I wouldn’t have wanted to, either – I was too busy living.

Some people cannot abide anything about what’s now called second-wave feminism because of how some of its ideas have panned out all these decades later. Maybe it’s easier for me to distinguish all the variety because I was there at that particular beginning. Most feminist ideas from that period are now accepted as obvious; few people would argue with them. But some were provocative and mind-bending, such as Firestone’s idea that women were a class – an underclass subordinated to men because of biology. But it was also only one of a lot of ideas flying around.

When I nearly ran into Catherine MacKinnon a couple of years ago in Basel, I commented that we are more or less the same age, too. Her ideas have not changed [3] over all these decades; she goes on saying the same thing over and over, in the case of prostitution still citing a study from 1976 that proves all prostitutes were abused as children. It is very annoying that a few fanatics claim to speak for everyone interested in women’s movements in the 60s and 70s, as I wrote in Extremist Feminism: Something Dark [4].

At New Slave Trade or Moral Panic? [5], a panel on trafficking at London’s Battle of Ideas in 2010, I said contemporary ideas about women’s innate sexual vulnerability are a big step backward. Firestone thought biology was key and so do today’s victimising fundamentalists. But Firestone and friends advocated revolution: women seizing power, achieving autonomy, throwing off their chains, taking responsibility, taking risks. The Rescue Industry, in contrast, has infantilised women by inserting itself between them and the forces oppressing them, supposedly in order to protect them

The full panel and some audience interventions are on the Battle of Ideas’s website. [6] Thanks to Carol Leigh [7]for putting together this Naked Anthropologist clip.

I still cannot get over how a gender expert hearing me speak at the International Development Institute i [8]n Sussex exclaimed, in some distress, that it is irresponsible for me to talk like this. I’m supposed to have betrayed original, fundamental tenets of feminism. Sigh – the ideas flying around during this era certainly don’t thrill me, that’s for sure.

Laura Agustín, the Naked Anthropologist

Share [9]

Article printed from The Naked Anthropologist: http://www.lauraagustin.com

URL to article: http://www.lauraagustin.com/second-wave-feminism-revolution-nofar-cry-from-the-rescue-industry

URLs in this post:

[1] Image: http://www.lauraagustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/first-year.jpg

[2] Image: http://www.lauraagustin.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/shulamithfirestone.jpg

[3] Her ideas have not changed: http://www.lauraagustin.com/me-and-catharine-mackinnon-on-prostitution-gender-patriarchy-and-sex-not-two-minds-with-but-a-single-thought

[4] Extremist Feminism: Something Dark: http://www.lauraagustin.com/extremist-feminism-in-swedish-government-something-dark

[5] New Slave Trade or Moral Panic?: http://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2010/session_detail/4117

[6] Battle of Ideas’s website.: http://www.battleofideas.org.uk/index.php/2012/video_result/5553

[7] Carol Leigh : http://bayswan.org/

[8] International Development Institute i: http://www.lauraagustin.com/irresponsible-talk-on-sex-work-gender-equality-sex-tourism-and-state-feminism

[9] Image: http://www.addtoany.com/share_save

[10] Satanic Sex on Sunday: Gunilla Ekberg, Sex War and Extremist Feminism: http://www.lauraagustin.com/satanic-sex-on-sunday-gunilla-ekberg-sex-war-and-extremist-feminism

[11] Man licking women will make men stop buying sex? Anti-prostitution feminism goes wacky: http://www.lauraagustin.com/man-licking-women-will-make-men-stop-buying-sex-anti-prostitution-feminism-goes-wacky

Copyright 2008 Laura Agustín. All rights reserved.