web analytics
The Naked Anthropologist · Business strategies brought to campaign to 'End Demand' for commercial sex | The Naked Anthropologist

Business strategies brought to campaign to ‘End Demand’ for commercial sex

Pornography is characterised as a training manual for men to buy sex in the campaign described here. Sound odd? Developments confirm that industry was a good term to describe the burgeoning phenomenon I used in the title of my book (Sex at the Margins: Migration, Labour Markets and the Rescue Industry), and I now see it as logical that business strategies should be brought to the cause. This campaign aims to eliminate demand for commercial sex (elsewhere in the report called the demand for trafficking, which they should scrap as it makes no sense). Organisations subscribing include ngos, public services like police, FBI and hospitals, business corporations, foundations, journalists, nuns et cetera. Are government employees permitted to use their titles in such privately-funded campaigns?

From the Executive Summary of the National Planning Meeting to Eliminate Demand for Commercial Sex, Cambridge, Massachusetts, May 8–May 10, 2010, Sponsored by the Embrey Family Foundation and Hunt Alternatives Fund:

Most public and private resources dedicated to human trafficking in the past decade have been crisis oriented, understandably geared toward rescuing and rehabilitating victims and, to some extent, prosecuting the perpetrators. However, policymakers, academics, and activists increasingly recognize that the endless supply of victims won’t abate unless we combat the demand for trafficking. A growing number of countries and cities worldwide have designed policies and programs to end this demand. We are not starting from scratch.

Inspired by the work of others worldwide, and in collaboration with a team of top-level advisers, Hunt Alternatives Fund is launching a multi-year, multi-stakeholder campaign to eradicate demand for commercial sexual exploitation in the United States.

As a first step, Abt Associates Inc., a consultancy in Cambridge, MA, was contracted to review practice, policy, law, and research related to demand reduction. The Abt consultants were asked to suggest three to four frameworks for developing a national strategy.

The planning meeting was a chance to develop a common understanding of demand and create a national campaign focused on effectiveness and devoid of partisanship and ideology. Recommendations included the following (also called Landscape Assessment for the National Campaign).

1. Conduct ongoing research, especially as a tool to unlock public (thus, official) support.
2. Leverage survivors’ knowledge and experiences to put the research in a human context and to cultivate political will by making an undeniable case for addressing demand.
3. Lobby Congress to pass, strengthen, and fund laws.
4. Build coalitions to unify the movement’s work. Dr. Shively cited mental health as an example of how a movement can use procedures.

A selection of suggestions from the meeting:

  • We need to attack prostitution as “a business like any other corporation,” and we must convert profit-making practices into liabilities, as was done to the tobacco industry.
  • We should seize large marketing opportunities, such as the upcoming World Cup matches in South Africa, to “create controversy on a world level” and use it to draw attention to prostitution.
  • Hotels that are sites of exploitation should train employees to recognize the signs of sex trafficking and require that they sign a Code of Conduct sponsored by ECPAT, but many refuse to do so.
  • We need to harness the power of technology, specifically e-advertising, to raise awareness and increase public engagement.
  • We should tap “celebrity power” to use major stars’ influence to encourage public engagement.

Read the report’s Executive Summary or the whole long thing. Here’s the list of participants in the planning meeting:

• David Abramowitz, Director of Policy and Government Relations, Humanity United
• Christopher Adams, Polaris Project, Director Of Operations
• Annjanette Alejano-Steele, Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Research and Training Director
• Kayrita Anderson, Harold & Kayrita Anderson Family Foundation, CEO
• Hilary Axam, DOJ Civil Rights, Acting Director Human Trafficking Prosecution Unit
• Luis cdeBaca, Ambassador at Large, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. Department of State
• Christina Bain, Program Administrator for the Initiative to Stop Human Trafficking, Carr Center for Human Rights Policy, Kennedy School, Harvard University
• Kevin Bales, Free the Slaves, President
• Julie Bindel, Journalist, Researcher and Feminist Campaigner
• Katherine Blakeslee, U.S. Agency for International Development Director, Office of Women in Development
• Rachel Boisselle, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Special Agent
• Theodore Bunch, A CALL TO MEN, Co-Director
• Cathy Boisvert, YWCA of Central Massachusetts Daybreak Coordinator of Special Projects
• Francine Braae, SAGE Project, Co-Executive Director
• John Chris Bray, Phoenix Police Department, Vice Enforcement Unit Sergeant
• Jimmie Briggs Jr., Man Up, Founder/Executive Director
• Elizabeth, Cafferty. Massachusetts General Hospital, Associate Director, Division of Global Health and Human Rights
• Brigitte Cazalis-Collins, Friends of Maiti Nepal, Executive Director
• Kristy Childs, Veronica’s Voice, Executive Director
• Katherine Chon, Polaris Project, President and Co-Founder
• Adam Cohen, NoPornNorthampton, Co-Founder
• Joseph Collins, Friends of Maiti Nepal
• Dawn Conway, LexisNexis, Sr. Vice President of Corporate Responsibility
• Janice Shaw Crouse, Ph.D., Concerned Women for America, Director and Senior Fellow at the Beverly LaHaye Institute
• Linda Daniels, Department of Defense, Program Manager, Trafficking in Persons Program
• Stephanie Davis, Georgia Women for a Change, Executive Director
• Gail Dines, Professor of Sociology and Women’s Studies, Wheelock College in Boston
• Rachel Durchslag, Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, Executive Director
• Jesse Eaves, Children in Crisis
• Carol Edgar, Carol Edgar Communications, Media Consultant
• Gayle Embrey, Embrey Family Foundation, Executive Vice President
• Heather Faris, Air Change, Co-Executive Director
• Melissa Farley, Prostitution Research & Education, Director
• Amanda Finger, Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Executive Director
• Ken Franzblau, Equality Now
• Eleanor Gaetan, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, Senior Policy Advisor
• Donna Gavin, Boston Police Department, Family Justice Center, Human Trafficking Unit, Sergeant Detective
• Susan Goldfarb, Children’s Advocacy Center of Suffolk County, Executive Director
• Samir Goswami, Chicago Community Trust, 2010 Fellow
• Deena Graves, Traffick911, Executive Director
• Florence Graves, Brandeis University, Founding Director, Schuster Institute for Investigative Journalism
• Ruchira Gupta, Apne Aap Women Worldwide, Founder/President
• Marian Hatcher, Cook County Sheriff’s Office, Administrative Assistant to the Executive Director
• Kaethe Morris Hoffer, Chicago Alliance Against Sexual Exploitation, Legal Director
• Wiveca Holst, Swedish Women’s Lobby
• Michael Horowitz, Hudson Institute
• Donna Hughes, University of Rhode Island, Professor and Eleanor M. and Oscar M. Carlson Endowed Chair; Co-Founder of Citizens Against Trafficking
• Kathryn Infanger, Marion County Prosecutor’s Office, Deputy Prosecutor
• Guy Jacobson, RedLight Children, Executive Director
• Cherie Jimenez, Kim’s Project, Coordinator
• Celiné Justice, Peace is Loud, Program Director
• Jackson Katz, Anti-sexist male activist and Co-founder of the Mentors In Violence Prevention
• Nan Kennelly, Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. State Department, Deputy Director
• Amanda Kimball, Children at Risk, Director of Public Policy and Government Affairs
• Beth Klein, Esq., Klein-Frank P.C., Founder & Managing Shareholder; Fellow of the Colorado Bar Foundation
• Mark Lagon, Consultant on Corporate Social Responsibility and Human Trafficking (an independent consultancy); former Ambassador at Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons at U.S. State Department
• Carole Lombard, Sisters of St. Joseph Boston, Director of Justice and Peace
• Victor Malarek, Investigative Journalist
• Mohamed Mattar, Johns Hopkins University, Director of the Protection Project
• Katherine McCullough, A Future. Not A Past./Juvenile Justice Fund, Campaign Director
• Terrie McDermott, Cook County Sheriff’s Office, Executive Director of the Department of Women’s Justice Services
• Karen McLaughlin, International Organization for Victim Assistance, Director of Public Policy
• John Miller, former Ambassador at Large to Combat Trafficking in Persons, U.S. State Department
• Martin Monto, Professor of Sociology, Portland State University,
• Bradley Myles, Polaris Project, Executive Director and CEO
• Maria-Isabel Nieto, BAVARIA S.A., Director of Government Affairs
• Audrey Porter, My Life My Choice, Assistant Director
• Norma Ramos, Coalition Against Trafficking in Women, Executive Director
• Jendi Reiter, NoPornNorthampton, Co-Founder
• Deborah Richardson, Women’s Funding Network, Chief Program Officer
• Mary Robertson, Laboratory to Combat Human Trafficking, Research Assistant; University of Colorado at Boulder, graduate student of sociology
• Beth Schapiro, Beth Schapiro and Associates, Executive Director
• Jeff Sedgwick, Keswick Associates, President; former Assistant Attorney General, U.S. Department of Justice
• Jane Nady Sigmon, Ph.D., Senior Coordinator for International Programs in the U.S. State Department’s Office to Monitor and Combat Trafficking in Persons, Global Affairs
• Carol Smolenski, ECPAT-USA, Executive Director
• Melysa Sperber, Vital Voices Global Partnership, Senior Program Officer for Human Rights
• Dorothy Stafford, Middle Georgia Alliance to End Regional Trafficking, Board of Directors
• Guðrún Jónsdóttir Stígamot, Counseling and Information Center on Sexual Violence, Spokesperson
• Karen Strauss, Polaris Project
• Lisa Thompson, The Salvation Army National Headquarters, Liaison for the Abolition of Sexual Trafficking
• Samantha Vardaman, Shared Hope International, Senior Director
• Steve Vienneau, FBI Boston, Agent
• Mary Rita Weschler, The Women’s Table, Sisters of St. Joseph of Boston, Director
• Alan White, SAGE Project, Co-Executive Director
• Linda Williams, University of Massachusetts Lowell, Professor
• Brian Willis, Global Health Promise, Director
• Alicia Foley Winn, The Boston Initiative to Advance Human Rights, Executive Director
• Thirteen police officers and sheriff’s deputies whose identities are withheld
• An additional 10 people who were interviewed but requested anonymity
• Relevant discussions were held with an additional 15 people during conferences and events convened by the U.S. Department of Justice and U.S. Department of State

Share

Tags: , , , , ,

  1. I am speechless. Genuinely. Astounding.

    Reply

  2. well this with not make James Delingpole very happy.

    Reply

  3. Very interesting – but know that we know the game plan, how do we stop it?

    Reply

  4. There is a similar report by abtAssociates.com from 2008 on the site of huntAlternatives.org as well: “Final Report on the Evaluation of the First Offender Prostitution Program”

    Reply

  5. Wow.

    You know, these people who have researched prostitution for all these years should really be embarrassed about how little they actually know about it.

    First, do they not understand that the vast majority of prostitution is at the cottage-industry level? It’s NOT a monolith, NOT a corporation, NOT the tobacco industry and cannot be dealt with as such.

    Second, they can attempt to end demand for commercial sexual exploitation all they want. They will never end demand for commercial sexual entertainment.

    Third, it would be really sweet if they spent all this energy on ending demand for commercial labor/domestic exploitation too. A victim of trafficking is a victim of trafficking, right?

    XX

    Reply

  6. right, Amanda! So maybe it is the ‘sex’ side and not so much the ‘exploitation’ side that is really bothering these corporate warriors?

    Reply

  7. Yeah that’s Swanee Hunt (Hunt Fund) for you! Recognize a few of those names and if you attend feminist conferences you can gain access to their strategies…but also if you check out their websites.

    My take on any social marketing campaign is that if it doesn’t not ring true, people can sniff that out and will laugh at it. There WILL be a backlash, trust me. Initially there will be a wave of following but once people start using their critical thinking skills it will die. Not many men are truly turned on by exploitation. If the campaign was about exploited women–say women working in beer gardens in Cambodia—then it would cause people to open their eyes up. But when it involves situations of consenting adults, then it simply a situation of marginalizing normal feelings of desire., and who buys that crap (in the long run)?

    Reply

  8. I wish I could be so positive, Michelle, especially about people’s critical thinking skills…

    I think in our current culture most of us experience our normal feelings of desire being marginalised. It is very pervasive. Sex workers I speak to say that clients in particular are often very conflicted about paying for sex. The problem with this type of campaign is it does nothing to curb the real exploitation you mention, but it does contribute to reinforcing negative attitudes about sex, sexual freedom and sex work. But in my opinion, that is the underlying aim of their project, anyway. To moralise anout and to pathologise our sexualities.

    Reply

  9. If you ask me, the anti-trafficking crusaders operate more like a single international corporation than anything in the criminal world. They all seem to cough up the same delusional statistics, repeat the same hand-picked terminology, and subscribe to nearly identical beliefs. You find more diversity of thought in most religious denominations.

    “Crime” is a huge conglomeration of independent (often competing) individuals or small groups with the common thread that they are all operating outside the law. These advocacy groups seem like one huge organization conveniently broken up into bite-size subgroups all sharing the same central intelligence.

    Reply

  10. Can someone answer my question about the participation in such a campaign of government employees in high positions, both federal and other? Is it allowed?

    Reply

  11. If your question is whether or not the people you list as participants are acting in their official government capacity at the meeting, I think the answer is yes. The departments of State and Justice make no secret of their enthusiastic participation in the anti-trafficking crusade and I doubt they would have any problem with officials attending such a conference even though the U.S. does not legislate against prostitution (from the supply or demand side) at the national level.

    The State Department in particular has a section on their website dedicated to fighting trafficking and is a major source of many of the inflated statistics commonly repeated by anti-traffickers.

    Admittedly, I haven’t seen any official governmental policy in support of national legislation attacking demand and I don’t think attendance at a conference supporting demand reduction necessarily says they are entertaining it as a potential strategy, but I have almost no doubt that U.S. government officials are attending in an official capacity.

    And that’s as close as my non-answer is going to get to an answer.

    Reply

    1. YES! Sexuality is stigmatized every way you look at it! It is absolutely needed, that we approach the subject of sex in a more rational reasonable manner, and without the shaming and the stigmatization!

      They did in fact go to the justice dept. in an attempt to federalize anti-prostitution laws and the answer was ‘It is a state’s right issue’.
      (my source is someone who was actually working in the U.S. attorneys office)

      This IS THE BACK DOOR strategy to the eventual federalization of these laws!!!!!

      These are the same anti-porn prohibitionists who failed in the 90′s coming back around for another try. They found the trafficking issue as a new vehicle.

      After many years (they clearly admit this) of putting state by state laws into effect, then they will have the platform they need to federalize. Once this is done, then they will be able to get all the statistics they have been preciously manifesting through their ‘junk science’, since every prostitution charge will amount to a trafficking charge. Never mind that they will be counting consensual sex workers as being trafficked sex workers (we all know they refuse to acknowledge a difference). With these ‘statistics’ they will be able to get millions and millions in funding for their cause.

      Some people really plan ahead!

      This is a highly calculated, well planned, well organized and highly funded effort.

      Reply

      1. elle, thank you for that further background information and confirmation. i am sure that in general people are not aware of this history.

        Reply

      2. hmm. anti-trafficking, yes, government websites full of it, employees sent to endless meetings. but eliminate-demand? that isn’t a US government goal. it’s the easy slipping between these two that catches my attention.

        Reply

      3. it’s the easy slipping between these two that catches my attention.

        Yes. Mine too. It’s the utopian myth that the Swedish Model works, come home to roost. Bombarded with it long enough, I think we’ll eventually start to see some government acceptance of the idea, at least as a philosophy worthy of consideration.

        I see the focus on the demand side as a way for feminists to attack prostitution without appearing to be attacking women, not to mention the fact that criminalizing women seems to be a little contrary to the rescue industry’s portrayal of women as victims. Another one of my simplistic condensations. I think attacking demand and legalizing supply could be the strategy of the future for the rescue industry in the U.S. Although that would be a real uphill battle at the federal level, it might seem more appealing than fighting many different battles at the state level.

        Reply

      4. Thank you for sharing this, Laura.

        Reply

Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>